New Google Competitor - July 30th, 2008
Google has long been the dominant search engine in the market but can any of the new and emerging search engines be a real competitor. At Just Search we see new search engines with novel ideas come and go but much media hype has surrounded the recent release of Cuil. The hype generated mainly surround the pedigree of the founders and the unique selling points of the search engine.
Cuil?s founders are quite simply some of the best in the business when it comes to search. Two former employees of Google and its TeraGoogle project along with Tom Costello from IBM’s Web Fountain project and Louis Monier, founder of Altavista form the foundations. These guys certainly know about search.
Along with this great line up Cuil differs in four major areas. They are web index, algorithm, results display and finally privacy. According to Cuil size does matter and it is there belief that they have the biggest web index on the web. It has an estimated 120 billion pages. One of the other things is privacy. I personally don’t think this is big issue but many of the older generation regard privacy as important so this will put their minds at ease. Cuil does say that it will not log IP addresses.
I think the most important USP’s are the algorithm and the unique results display. Google is of course famed for its algorithm so how does Cuil stack up. Well, Cuil is trying to rank its results by content rather than popularity. It obviously has to take into account popularity as people will expect to see certain results for search terms. It will also be interesting to see how back links are considered in the Cuil algorithm. Currently the relevancy levels created from the algorithm don’t really match up to the levels of Google but given time and refinement it may catch up. It’s also disappointing to see we don’t rank highly for search engine optimisation whereas we do in Google.
The other thing is the unique layout. Cuil has a simple front screen like Google but the search results screen is completely different. Cuil is lays out its results screen in three columns and the descriptions provided for results seem to be longer than that of Google. You are also given an associated image to the side of the site description. I think this is a nice touch. I also like the descriptions but think the layout makes the results difficult to read. The one advantage is that with the column layout you have three site listings at the top of the page rather than one. This could significantly change the click through rates for the sites. Users can also change the layout through the preference options.
In conclusion Cuil is a lot better than most start-ups and they have clearly learnt from the mistakes of other start-ups. The novel layout and large index does make a difference and with the right direction and advancements this search engine could make a real difference. It may take some time before we really see the true performance of this search engine. Everyone loves an underdog though. I think Cuil will also need to develop some more search functions and results in order to really get to the next level. It will be interesting to see if this site effects seo in the future.
Mark
SEO Programmer
